9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

How much sway case legislation holds could vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To explore this concept, look at the following case law definition.

As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally recognized conviction. Read more

Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to having sexually molested the few’s son several times.

145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised with the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Protected with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd very little to fret about.

If you find an error during the written content of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the regulation laid down with the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority of your parent department on the petitioner as well as the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in implementing the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to in the state court, within the same level.

Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems here of legislation.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.